Compatibility and vetting review for ship-to-ship LNG transfers, with every finding traced to its source document.
Know before you moor.
A nominated carrier submits a large set of documents. The platform reads that submission, cross-checks it against the terminal's own controlled requirements, and presents the result to a marine superintendent for decision.
Every finding traced to its source document
The terminal's own controlled requirements applied
Conflicts surfaced rather than averaged
Acceptance recorded, never computed
A large submission holds more cross-references than a reader can hold in their head.
The same parameter can be requested in several documents, controlled requirements can be spread across manuals, and answers can differ from one another.
- Submit
Submit documents
The nominated carrier's document set is uploaded as a single submission against a case.
- Cross-check
Cross-check against requirements
Each submitted value is read, located, and compared against the terminal's controlled requirements.
- Decide
Superintendent decides
Findings are presented for review. The platform never issues a clearance itself — clearance is granted only by the superintendent.
LNG Aurora × FSRU Wayfinder
Illustrative compatibility review
This fictional presentation shows how a review can separate aligned evidence, open clarification and a decision still required.
- Liquid manifold nominal size
- DN four hundredOK — Sources aligned
- Emergency release arrangement
- Declared in both submissions! — Clarification open
- Mooring arrangement
- Review evidence attachedX — Reviewer decision required
- Fender interface
- Within the declared envelopeOK — Sources aligned
The comparison remains visible so the reviewer can inspect every cited source rather than take the finding on trust.
The platform advises, evidences and drafts. Superintendent Approves
Every finding is a recommendation. It carries the source document, the exact location within that document, the requirement applied and the comparison performed, so a reviewer can verify it independently rather than take it on trust.
Acceptance remains a human decision. It is recorded with the reviewer's name, their reason and the time it was made, and that record is added to — never overwritten.